2024 Election: Not About Trump

  

 

        

            As much as the Democrat Party, progressives, and Never-Trump conservatives, most of the last being neocons, wanted to make this election about the personality or character of Donald Trump. It was not. I should add that Trump himself may have wanted, and may believe, the election was about him. It was not.

The rhetoric against Trump was that he is not morally fit. Of great concern in this line of thinking is that he is authoritarian, fascist, Hitler, misogynist, and racist. Kamala Harris joined this group late in the campaign. 

In this brief essay, my goal is to calmly consider a hotly contested election that had plenty of heated rhetoric on both sides. I will be pointing to some evidence from the election, but I will also be making inferences from that data that will move into the realm of intuition, and therefore a leap of thought. This ought to create a degree of tolerance, on your part as a reader, and on my part if you as a reader make a different leap of thought. As Wiliam James in his 1896 lecture The Will to Believe put it, intuition is a valid way toward making decisions and maintain our concern for truth. Such hunches do not have the character of empirical proof, but they are attempts to learn from this election. We see, we reason about what we see, but we also become present to self and world in a way that allows us to see connections beyond black/white, either/or thinking. Given that I am in this realm of reflection, I can only hope that what I share arises with humility and exhibits tolerance toward someone else who might view the same data, share the common experience of this election, but move in a different direction. 

I begin by sharing some questions that guide my reflections.

How does racist Trump increase his share of black and Hispanic votes?

How does misogynistic Trump increase his support among suburban women?

Is it too much to ask that identity politics would end after the inroads Trump made into the Democratic coalition? Given the comments on my X feed, Yes it is, sadly.

How do you peacefully transfer power to Hitler, to the man who is an existential threat to democracy? The lie to this concern has been that since the sweeping GOP win, Harris and Biden promise a smooth transition. Had they believed their own rhetoric, there would not be a smooth transition of power to Trump-Vance and his team. 

            This is a deeply divided nation politically. The election was close in the popular vote. The battleground states were close, Trump taking all seven such states. Further, even in blue states, Trump significantly increased his percentage from 2020. It was a significant win, and as in most elections, a portion of the persuadable electorate went to Trump. My interest here is not in why80-90% of the voting public are committed to the political Left or the political Right. My interest is in what makes 6 or 7 % of the remaining voters collectively move in one way or the other. That group moved toward Trump and the GOP this year.

            Political conservatives might like to think it was a move to the political right, but it was not.

            Kamala Harris, make sure you pronounce her name right or you are a misogynist and racist, was a bad candidate. She supported defund the police. She wanted to confiscate guns. Her support for the green agenda, of which fracking became a symbol, her support for the trans agenda, her support for open borders, her inability to say how she would differ from Biden, became problems that pushed people toward Trump. Obama scolding black men for not showing enthusiasm for Kamala Harris is unseemly. Thinking men need counseling for not enthusiastically voting for Kamala Harris shows little understanding of why people, not just men, vote the way they do. The effort to re-brand her was not successful. The point is that the election was not about her, especially her as a woman or a person of color. She was the shiny object to distract voters from the machinery in Washington DC that has set America on a path that many voters said in polls was the wrong direction. She still received about 47% of the popular vote. There are a solid number of people on the political Left who will vote for the most liberal candidate. The ability of the Democrat Party to get out their voters is amazing, given how bad their candidates for President and Vice-President were. In this election some usually conservative voters were concerned about Trump, but not as many as Kamala Harris needed. People who voted against her did not do so because she was a woman or because she was black. The election had little to do with her.

            Donald Trump designed an amazing campaign that broke apart the Democrat Party coalition that included union workers, Jews, Catholics, blacks, Hispanics, college educated, and women. He knew he would have a certain percentage of the voting public just because he was conservative. He expanded his base by making inroads into the Catholic, Jewish, Hispanic, and black vote. He also had two assassination attempts, Thomas Matthew Crooks on July 13, 2024, in Butler County, PA and Ryan Wesley Routh on Sunday, September 15, 2024, at a Trump property while he was golfing. After the first one, still bleeding, rising to say “Fight, Fight, Fight,” was an inspiration. For many Americans, battling through the thinly veiled political nature of lawfare was a sign of strength. Like all of us, Trump has his failings. In Christian terms, we are all sinners. His failings and sins were not what defined him in the minds of many Americans.

Yet, I do not think any of this quite gets to what tipped the scales to Donald Trump. I grant that some voters were excited about Harris or Trump. However, I am going to suggest that what tipped the scales toward Trump was a sense that something was not normal in America, and that America needed a return to normalcy. In that sense, when Biden suggested a return to normalcy was important at his inauguration, he was right. Had his presidency modeled that thought, everything may well have ended differently. As Democrat West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin says every at every opportunity, he failed to do so. I can hear those who believe the rhetoric about Trump laugh when I say that voters for Trump in this election what a return to normalcy, but I ask you to hear me out.

To put the theme directly: the Trump-Vance campaign, combined with the GOP candidates, were the moderates in this election. The Democrat Party put themselves on the extreme Left end of political thought. This was intentional by Obama, Biden, the Clintons, Pelosi, and Schumer as political leaders of that party. 

Is it a surprise that the economy drove voters of all types, especially Blacks, Hispanics, suburban white women, and youth, to Trump?

Is it a surprise that illegal immigration and open borders drove people of all types to Trump?

Is it a surprise that the American people do not want endless wars?

Is it a surprise that Americans do not want to coddle pro-Hamas and anti-Jewish demonstrations on campus that make Jews uncomfortable to go to college? 

What is this, that the political opponents of Trump use the law to put a former president in jail? Adding to that, taking after his family? This effort reminded me of the impeachment of Bill Clinton, which also seemed to many voters to be a political rather than legal effort to bring down a political opponent. 

How has a political party that claims to be pro woman support biological males in female sports? Does anyone think it would have no effect on elections forever?

How does a political strategist think that a closing argument promoting late term abortions is going to persuade Hispanics and Catholics to move toward Harris?

How does Joe Biden get 16 million more votes in 2020 than did Obama in 2012 and Harris in 2020? I do not know. Biden won 81.2 million votes in 2020, while Trump won in 2024 with 76,500, when he had 74.2 million in 2020 and Harris lost in 2024 with 73,900, although these totals are not final. I do know that Biden beat the vote totals of Harris in every state, and I think in every precinct, and he beat her in demographics like black, women, and youth. 

The lack of insight into why the election went the way it did will be a self-inflicted malady. The continued efforts to paint all things Trump as fascist, Hitler, and white-supremacist will work with those who already believe it but will not be persuasive outside that self-created echo-chamber. 

I was impressed with the final Rasmussen poll, but then, I have been impressed historically with this poll:

 

🔴 Trump: 49% (+3)

🔵 Harris: 46%

🟢 Other: 3%

🟡 Undecided: 2%

 

At Trump +3% Popular Vote:

 

1.  TRUMP Wins 310-330 EVs

2. HOUSE GOP Gains 10-30 additional seats – this was wrong

3.  SENATE GOP Gains 3-6 additional seats

 

I voted for GOP in Florida because I am a political conservative. I want less federal government. I want fewer wars, and thus did not like George W. Bush in the Middle East or Biden in Ukraine. It was enough for me that RFKJr, for whom I would have voted, Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk, Nikki Haley, for whom I did vote, are campaigning for Trump. It may seem minor, but Riley Gaines makes a strong point protecting female sports as important in itself as well as a symbol of larger issue. I trust that if we are friends, we will stay such even if we disagree on this political matter. There are things far more important than that. 

I have read the Democrat Party platform. The Dem platform had entire chapters with which I disagreed, climate change agenda being the big one. However, entire chapters seemed like an alternate universe to me. I just do not see the world scene or the military, for example, being in such wonderful shape as the document says. I certainly do not see the economy as being such great shape as the document suggests. More than that, I can only assume that this document stands as the Harris agenda, although most of it understandable refers to Biden. It rarely mentioned Biden (7 times in 24 pages), whereas Dems mentioned Trump 150 times in 91 pages, and refers to the MAGA crowd in a derogatory way regularly. The Dems in tone were polemical, broadsides against their opponents. Polemics can help people see the differences between two sides. The weakness of a polemic is that it exaggerates one’s own virtues and paints the opponent as if they have nothing to contribute to the country. Overall, I get that they really do not like Trump, but that is not a policy. I also get that they think a climate emergency requires immediate action, and I do not. I also get that they want abortions mandated as a right rather than differentiated democratically within the states, which I also disagree with. They think democracy is at risk when they are the ones who removed their own nominee through elites, replaced the voted upon nominee by the elite, and have colluded with social media to suppress free speech, as Zuckerberg has recently admitted. They really like the American Rescue Plan. They think they have done a wonderful job on the border. They think they have done a wonderful job with crime. It shows that when it comes to statistics, one can make them serve any agenda one wants.

In contrast, the GOP platform is nice, a 21—page statement of the values to which it is committed and the principles it will use to get there. 

I would encourage anyone to read the two platforms and decide which sounds like the direction you would like to see the country go.

In addition, the two conventions were starkly different. 

The GOP convention had many powerful moments. As vice-President, Trump has selected J. D. Vance, someone who will be loyal to him, but who, given his Marine background, his rise from rural Ohio, and his education, will bring youth and vitality to the ticket. 

The speech by Trump accepting the GOP nomination was calm. I highlight what I think were moments when Trump appealed for unity.

The discord and division in our society must be healed. As Americans, we are bound together by a single fate and a shared destiny. We rise together. Or we fall apart. I am running to be president for ALL of America, not half of America, because there is no victory in winning for half of America. 

Despite such a heinous attack, we unite this evening more determined than ever. Our resolve is unbroken, and our purpose is unchanged--to deliver a government that serves the American People.

Nothing will stop me in this mission. Because our vision is righteous, and our cause is pure.

No matter what obstacle comes our way: we will not break. We will not bend. We will not back down. And I will never stop fighting for you, your family, and our magnificent country. 

Everything I have to give, with all of the energy and fight in my heart and soul, I pledge to our nation tonight.

This election should be about the issues facing our country and how to make America successful, safe, free, and great again. In an age when our politics too often divide us, now is the time to remember that we are all fellow citizens—we are one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 

Just a few short days ago, my journey with you nearly ended. And yet here we are tonight, all gathered together, talking about the future, promise, and renewal of America. We live in a world of miracles. 

None of us knows God’s plan, or where life’s adventure will take us. But if the events of last Saturday make anything clear, it is that every single moment we have on earth is a gift from God. We have to make the most of every day for the people and country we love.

The attacker in Pennsylvania wanted to stop our movement—but the truth is, this movement has never been about me, it has always been about YOU. It has always been about the hardworking, patriotic citizens of America. 

Your expectations are not big enough. It is time to start expecting and demanding the best leadership in the world, leadership that is bold, dynamic, relentless, and fearless. 

We are Americans. Ambition is our heritage. Greatness is our birthright.  

But as long as our energies are spent fighting each other, our destiny will remain out of reach. We must instead take that energy and use it to realize our country’s true potential—and write our own thrilling chapter of the American Story. 

It is a story of love, sacrifice, success, and unmatched devotion. 

Just like our ancestors, we must now come together, rise above past differences and disagreements, and go forward united, as one people, and one nation, pledging allegiance to one great and beautiful American flag. 

Tonight, I ask for your partnership, for your support, and I am humbly asking for your vote. Every day, I will strive to honor the trust you have placed in me, and I will never let you down.

 

Trump delivered a speech at Turning Point USA. I advise watching the full speech, as he is sharpening his speech against Harris and refining the presentation of what he hopes to do with a second term. For me, he came across as calm and moderate. I did not think the Democrat Party could do that, but with Kamala Harris and her left-wing extreme agenda, Trump is the moderate in this race. I do not advise taking the Harris interpretation of the speech as anything other than a dream on their part:

 

“Tonight, Donald Trump couldn’t pronounce words, insulted the faith of Jewish and Catholic Americans, lied about the election (again), lied about other stuff, bragged about repealing Roe, proposed cutting billions in education funding, announced he would appoint more extremist judges, revealed he planned to fill a second Trump term with more criminals like himself, attacked lawful voting, went on and on and on, and generally sounded like someone you wouldn’t want to sit near at a restaurant – let alone be President of the United States."

 

The lackluster performance of Joe Biden in the first debate and his continued feebleness led many Democrat political leaders to urge him to drop out of the race. However, the Wall Street Journal has convincingly shown that the staff of Joe Biden has been covering for him from the beginning. This means that his wife and family have provided cover, as well as his staff. It also means that Obama has been the one making the decisions. The Biden weakness in the debate provided the occasion for Kamala Harris to be the nominee. The rapid unity of the Democrat Party behind her on the surface is surprising. The immediate influx of money is superficially surprising. However, it all appears orchestrated. After the debate, President Obama guided Biden off the stage. This began the efforts to get Biden to step down from being the nominee of the Party. It seems clear Pelosi, Obama, Schumer, and the Clintons run the Party and have guided this process. If we learn the truth, my suspicion is that Harris or another member of the Cabinet threatened Biden with invoking the 25^th amendment and shame him into stepping down from a nomination process in which he proved himself the favorite of Democrat voters. In that sense, it was a coup, but obviously, not in the sense of a threat of violence. My suspicion all along has been that the Biden presidency is the third term of Obama, and I think this process indicates that is true. As I understand it, Obama and the Clintons do not like each other, but they want the Democrat Party in power and they have a deep disgust of Donald Trump, especially since he is, in their words, a threat to democracy, coupled with viewing him as fascist with dictator plans. Harris brings much to the table. Her gender and ethnicity will form a sharp contrast with the GOP ticket that will be attractive to many. It will feed the narrative that Trump and the GOP are racist and misogynist. 

What I find striking here is that the same cabal that undermined the first Trump presidency with the Russia Hoax, impeached Trump, accused Trump of insurrection, and brought legal challenges to Trump, also engineered the departure of Joe Biden from this race. I also find it striking that the Party united around Kamala Harris, who received zero delegates in the 2020 primary. Money guided this unusual process. If Harris were not on the ticket, the money would have to be returned to the donors. As soon as Biden stepped down, money flowed to the Democrat Party.

The shift in the media was swift. It was not long ago that most of the media defended the competency of Biden and said the accusation to the contrary was right wing propaganda. The push was on to have Biden step away from being the Democrat nominee, even though he had won the primary. The reason had nothing to do with his health and everything to do with the fear that he would lose. The shift was also swift in recasting Harris from being an ineffective VP who had trouble with keeping staff to being a rock star. One cannot dismiss lightly the free campaign ads that many news outlets will offer.

I voted for GOP in Florida because I am political conservative. Since that was a move I made in the late 1970s, some of my college friends might be surprised. It was enough for me that RFKJr, Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk, Nikki Haley, are campaigning for him. It may seem minor but protecting female sports is import in itself as well as a symbol of larger issue. In fact, you can make the case, as the Wall Street Journal editorial board recently did, that Harris “is the least-known candidate in modern history.”

Since the election, Donald Trump has moved quickly on sharing his appointments for his administration. They are mostly young and unburdened by the past, to use a favorite theme of Vice-President Harris. A 78-year-old President wants a team assembled from a different generation than the generation that got the federal government into the bloated mess it has become. Some of his team have been standard, but many are unusual. Given the involvement of the FBI and CIA in attempts to undermine his first term through the Russia Hoax, the efforts over the last four years of the legal system moving against him and his family, and the Pentagon in promoting the trans-agenda of the Democrat Party and promoting endless wars of the neocons, I am not surprised that Trump wants people in those positions that he can trust and who will not undermine him. Not using the FBI to give background checks, but rather a private firm, is also understandable, given the history with the FBI. Sadly, the weaponization of these departments against Trump, his family, and political conservatives, has brought us to this place. There will undoubtedly be people fired. These efforts will be presented as fascist and authoritarian, but to use this rhetoric against those who descend low enough to use it, what was fascist and authoritarian was Obama-Biden weaponizing these agencies against Trump and undermining his first term. 

Both sides use the language of saving America from the other side, but I think America needs saving from both sides. The television show Fallout (2024) showed a dystopian future created by two opposing groups who believed the world needed to be saved from the other side. I want to calmly consider this election. 

I have come across the Dignity Index, which seeks to promote respect for the opposition in the public square. I would encourage anyone to read it. The dehumanizing of the opponent is part of the sense that we have departed from normalcy.

The rhetoric in this country has always been vigorous around presidential elections. However, it has rarely reached the level where the advice of one side, this time the political Left, advises its loyalists to isolate themselves from friendships from the other side. This is what happens with the true believer, in this case, that Trump is fascists, and therefore his voters are fascist. To vilify half the country in this way is an unacceptable attempt at shaming people into the political Left. I agree with Michael LaRosa, former spokesperson for Jill Biden, who in his colorful way said on X “This s*** has to stop,” which is how he responded to an MSNBC guest who referred to Pete Hegseth as a white supremacist for opposing DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) because of the way it is applied. His point was that one can oppose that policy for reasons other than being a white supremacist. Reducing serious policy differences to identity politics is shallow form of thinking. 

Which leads me to consider another possibility about the rhetoric on the pollical Left. Respect for the worth and dignity of the political opposition is basic in a democracy, for it is what keeps winners from persecuting and jailing the losers. Donald Trump has become the shiny object for the progressive to use this extreme rhetoric to deflect attention of voters from their unusual behavior. DEI and the trans agenda have become political ways to stifle debate and to lead to potentially dangerous results, such as a woman stepping into a boxing ring with a biological male. Do you really want your daughter to be in the rest room with a biological male? Disagreeing with such movements politically is compatible with respecting the diverse nature of modern societies, valuing equality of opportunity, and providing an inclusive embrace of human beings simply because they are human beings, apart from their beliefs and values. Beyond this, top leaders of the Democrat Party using the FBI, CIA, (Russia Hoax primary among them), federal lawyers, against those who have ideas they do not like, whether Trump or others, and engineering social media monopolies to target political conservatives, using fact checks inappropriately, all just seem weird, to use the Tim Walz term. The warning signs are there in the way Britain and the European Union are applying DEI in jailing people who do not use the right pronouns. Something feels quite undemocratic and unamerican about all this.

Rules of civility and respect are difficult to apply in the political arena, especially when the election concerns the most powerful position on the planet. However, one would appreciate at least the attempt. 

Culturally, things are changing rapidly. To “Adam Schiff” someone is becoming a verb to describe unsavory and deceptive actions, as in to unfairly accuse. The Trump shuffle is becoming a thing in the sports world. Joe and Mica of MSNBC, who have been relentless on the Hitler, fascist, threat to democracy, and threat to women, went to Mar-largo to visit with Trump. The criticism of this visit from the Left has been that it normalizes Trump. The lack of self-reflection here is amazing, for they are the ones who need to normalize their relationship to Trump and to his voters. His 75 million voters, most of whom voted to support his agenda in the House and Senate, have already normalized him. Normal is becoming cool again. The atmosphere is incredibly different from 2016. 

For Christians, the election is not a basis for either depression or hope. Christian confidence is in what God has done in Jesus Christ. Further, it is time to remember that Jesus calls us to love our neighbor, regardless of their beliefs and values. To put a sharper point on it, if your neighbor is a person transitioning their gender, Jesus calls you to love them. Regardless of the color of their skin, their religious beliefs, their political beliefs you are not love them and pray for them. Jesus advises us to love the enemy. The New Testament epistles call upon us to pray for our leaders. In this political environment, Christians need to have a witness that their allegiance to Jesus transcends their political allegiance, and they demean that witness when they identify their faith with their political allegiance, or worse, identify it by the person who they are against. An act of political courage by the Christian in this environment is to speak truth to the powerful within your political tribe.

John Wesley offered some advice to his societies on October 6, 1774:

 

I met those of our society who had voted in the ensuing election and advised them:

       To vote, without fee or reward, for the person they judged most worthy

       To speak no evil of the person they voted against, and

        To take care their spirits were not sharpened against those that voted on the other side.

 

Lord, hear our prayer.

I Enoch, Testament of Abraham and Apocalypse of Abraham

 

I Enoch 1-36 (160 BC) Apocalyptic Pseudepigrapha in Israel

I Enoch or the Book of Enoch, contained in 1-36 reflect the period around 160 BC. It was composed around Judea and was in use at Qumran in the pre-Christian period. Essenes and early Christians knew the themes of the book. It is not regarded as scripture by Jews or any Christian group, apart from the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which to this day regards it to be canonical. A short section of I Enoch (I Enoch 1:9) is quoted in the New Testament (Letter of Jude 1:14-15), and there apparently attributed to "Enoch the Seventh from Adam" (1 Enoch 60:8). The original text was partially in Aramaic and partially in Hebrew, much like the canonical Daniel. 

The book reflects the historical events immediately preceding and following the Maccabean revolt. It sheds light upon early Essene theology and upon early Christianity. It was used in the Epistle of Barnabas and the Apocalypse of Peter. Many of the early church authors, such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin, and Clement of Alexandria, knew the book and some were inspired by it. Tertullian had a high regard for the book. It had negative reviews from Augustine and Jerome. It remained in high regard in the Ethiopian church. That influence distinguishes Ethiopian Christians from Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox in their emphasis upon the origin of sin in Satan and fallen angels, as well as Adam, and these demonic spirits continue to lead humanity astray. Protective angels like Michael, Gabriel, Rafael, and Uriel play a larger role in this form of Christianity. 

God is the righteous and just God of the Old Testament, creator of the world, holy, lawgiver, the dispenser of history, and the judge of all. 

Sinners are economic exploiters, the political oppressors, and the socially unjust people of this world. Thus, it helps us appreciate the revolutionary mood of Jews and their staunch opposition to Greek and Roman imperialism as well as Jewish aristocracy, which aligned itself with the foreign oppressors. 

The book depends upon the Old Testament and influences the New Testament. Apocalyptic literature has moral indignation about the present world and the foreboding prediction of eschatological events and the ultimate destiny of the world. It presents its view of the stories of the Old Testament, such as fallen angels, the Flood, the history of Israel, and the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, through the paradigm of apocalyptic dualism, which contains a presentation of opposing cosmic powers of good and evil and between the present and coming age. The New Testament was molded by its language and thought. It was influential in molding New Testament doctrines concerning the nature of the Messiah, the Son of Man, the messianic kingdom, demonology, the future, resurrection, and final judgment. The entre eschatological theater and its symbolism in the New Testament has its inspiration here. 

Book One of Enoch is the parables of Enoch or the Book of Watchers. This first section of the Book of Enoch describes the fall of the Watchers, the angels who fathered the Nephilim (cf. the bene Elohim, Genesis 6:1-2) and narrates the travels of Enoch in the heavens. 

Chapters 1-5 are the introductory visions and parables of Enoch dealing with the fate of the wicked and the righteous. Dating is from the 100's BC. The introduction opens with an announcement of the final, coming punishment, the destruction of the wicked ones, and the resurrection of the righteous ones to an endless and sinless eternal life. In 1:1, the reference to the elect, shows that not all members of the people will partake of the salvation offered, but only those elected to it. It opens the way for the election of individuals.[1] Further, 1:2, where the vision relates only to the distant generation is coming, 52:1-5 where he sees secret things of heaven and the future things, which will be revealed to him, 80:1, he has had everything revealed to him, and 106:19, where the mysteries of the holy ones have been revealed to him, such passages show that the apocalyptic seer received a vision that will be manifest to the entire world only at the end of this age, namely, all the hidden things of heaven that are to take place on earth. In context, he notes that the generation that returned from exile did not receive all the blessings promised in either their return or in the rebuilding of the Temple. In the post-exilic period, the experience of successive empires brought the development of an eschatological expectation of a final actualizing of the rule of God at the end of the series of earthly kingdoms. Linked to this was the expectation of the righteousness of God for individuals beyond this earthly life with the resurrection of the just and the judgment of sinners.[2] The God of the universe, the Holy Great One, will come and march upon Mount Sinai and appear from the damp emerging from heaven and everyone shall be afraid and the fallen angels shall quiver, great fear seizing them, mountains falling down, high hills made law, the earth rent asunder, and all on the earth will perish, judgment coming upon all, including the righteous. The book is firm in its conviction that God has ordained all things that will take place in their time. However, to the righteous God will grant peace, shall preserve the elect, and kindness hall be upon them, for they shall belong to God and they shall prosper and be blessed, and the light of God shall shine upon them. Then, in a text Jude 14-15 quotes, God will arrive with ten million of the holy ones to execute judgment upon all. god will destroy the wicked ones and censure all flesh because of the harsh things (from Jude 15) the wicked and sinners committed against God. In Chapter 5, he prays that the hard-hearted not find peace, but to the elect there shall be light joy, and peace, and they shall inherit the earth. 

In 6-11 regards the fall of angels, from before the Maccabean period. Gen 6:1-4 alludes to the sons of God who had intercourse with the daughters of the people. This author transforms this idea into a theology of fallen angels, who consorted with women and produced giants who sinned against the people. They corrupted the people through the instructions in forbidden sciences like making arms, cosmetics, and precious metals. Michael, Uriel, Raphael, and Gabriel appeal to God to judge the inhabitants of the world and the fallen angels. God then sends Uriel to tell Noah of the coming cataclysm and what he needs to do. God sends Gabriel to have Noah hide. God sends Michael to bind the fallen angels. Allusions to the legend of the fallen angels occur elsewhere in Jewish writings (Sir 16:7). Jude 6 refers to angels who did not keep their proper position, leaving their dwelling, and God is keeping them in chains in deepest darkness, binding them for the day of judgment, a view that closely reflects Chapter 10, where God further has the angels and their children bound for seventy generations underneath the rocks until the day of their judgment of their consummation. In those days they will them into the bottom of the fire in torment, in the prison where they will be locked up forever, at which time they will burn and die (Jude 6, Rev 20:10, 14, 15, where the devil, the beast, the false prophet, and all who followed them will be tossed into the of fire, Mt 25:41, where the goats will be tossed into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and demons). All the nations shall worship and bless the Lord. 

In 12-16, Enoch has a vision dream vision that involves his intercession for the fallen angels, for Azazel, and his vision. The intercession of Enoch on behalf of the fallen angels fails. He is instructed to predict their final doom, a view reflected by Paul when he says that we shall judge angels (I Cor 6:3). The demons possessing a man asked Jesus if he has come to torment them before the time (Matt 8:29), which is consistent with the view that the demons are waiting for the day of the great conclusion, until the great age is consummated, and everything is concluded upon the fallen angels (Chapter 16). 

In 17-36, Enoch tours the earth and Sheol. In his first journey, he saw the vision of the end of everything alone and none among human beings will see as he has seen. He gives the names of the archangels. The second journey involves preliminary and final place of punishment of fallen stars. One place terrifies him (Chapter 21). The other (Chapter 22) is beautiful, having corners so that the souls of the children of the people should gather here, even as the Son of Man will gather the elect from the four winds (Matt 24:31). In 22:4-13, the passage divides humanity into three groups, the righteous in Sheol, the sinners not punished in their lifetime, and sinners punished in their lifetime. It appears that the righteous are raised and rewarded, while the unpunished sinners are raised and punished. This passage is a clear example of the idea of resurrection of those whom the consequences of their acts have not yet been allotted in this life. Daniel 12:2 could also refer to this notion if it is not referring to the resurrection of all people. One might see an example of this idea in John 5:29 and Acts 24:15. Such a basis is quite different from the confidence that arises out of fellowship with God. For such persons, even in face of death, fellowship with God cannot be destroyed and resurrection is to a new life in fellowship with God. For one who has this confidence, salvation has already come.[3] In another place (Chapter 23) he sees fire from the luminaries of heaven. He sees the seven mountains to the northwest and the tree of life (Chapters 24-25). He sees a beautiful tree which the Lord will plant in the direction of the Temple and from which the elect will eat, a view consistent with the notion that those who endure to the end will eat from the tree of life in the paradise of God (Rev 2:7, Rev 22:2, 14). In 25:4-5, this passage points up the importance of the vision of a new temple and its restoration was in Jewish literature.[4] It stresses that God as king in apocalyptic means that God is always present. Further, apocalyptic seers saw in heaven both coming end-time events and monuments of the primal past, such as the tree from which Adam and Eve ate in paradise.[5] He then sees Jerusalem and its surroundings (Ch 26). He sees the accursed valley, Gehenna (Matt 5:29-30). He journeys to the east (Ch 28-33), north (Ch 34), west (Ch 35), and south (36). 

.

I Enoch 37-71, Book of Similitudes/Parables (0-100 AD, Pseudepigrapha) Apocalyptic

 

            Book Two, the Similitudes/Parables, deals respectively with the coming judgment of the righteous and the wicked, the Messiah, the Son of Man, the Righteous One, and the Elect One, the exposition of additional heavenly secrets, the measuring Paradise, the resurrection of the righteous, and the punishment of the fallen angels. The scholarly debate centers on these chapters. The Book of Parables appears to be based on the Book of the Watchers but presents a later development of the idea of final judgment and of eschatology, concerned not only with the destiny of the fallen angels but also that of the evil kings of the earth. The Book of Parables uses the expression Son of Man for the eschatological protagonist, who is also called "Righteous One", "Chosen One", and "Messiah", and sits on the throne of glory in the final judgment. The first known use of The Son of Man as a definite title in Jewish writings is in 1 Enoch, and its use may have played a role in the early Christian understanding and use of the title.

Ch 37 is the introduction. Chapters 38-44 contain the first parable. Ch 38 is the coming judgment of the wicked. The Righteous One shall appear to reveal light to the righteous and elect and it would have been better for sinners not to have been born. The righteous shall rule the earth and the wicked shall be annihilated. Ch 39 describes the home of the righteous. There is no such thing as non-existence before the Lord of the Spirits. Ch 40 describes the four archangels. 41.1–2 is an anticipation of judgment, the Lord of the Spirits, and the four voices that Enoch heard in those days. 41.3–9 are astronomical or cosmic secrets. Ch 42 describes the dwelling-places of Wisdom and of Unrighteousness. Chapters 43–44 are astronomical or cosmological secrets.

An extensively discussed concept, part of the second parable, is that of the heavenly Messiah (45-57). 45-6 the situation of the apostates/unbelievers: the New Heaven and the New Earth. In peace the Lord has looked with favor upon the righteous ones and given them mercy and have causes them to dwell before the Lord, but sinners have come before the Lord so that the Lord can remove them from the earth. Enoch then discusses the Ancient of Days and the Son of Man. He is the Righteous One, the Son of Man, a pre-existent heavenly being who is resplendent and majestic, possesses all dominion, and sits on his throne of glory passing judgment upon all mortal and spiritual being. This description of the Messiah is placed in the Similitudes in the context of reflections upon the last judgment, the coming destruction of the wicked, and the triumph of the righteous opens. This eschatological concept is the more prominent and recurring theme throughout the book. Enoch saw the One to whom belongs the time before time. Another individual was present, whose face was like that of a human being and whose countenance was full of grace. He is the One born of human beings. He is the Son of Man, in whom righteousness dwells. He is destined to be victorious. He will remove kings from their comfortable seats, for their deeds are oppressive and are devoted to the gods they have fashioned. They deny the Lord of Spirits but like to congregate in the houses with the faithful ones who cling to the Lord of Spirits. Ch 47, the prayer of the righteous for vengeance and their joy at its coming. Enoch saw the Antecedent of Time, sitting upon the throne of glory, and the books of the living ones were opened before him. The holy ones are filled with joy because the number of the righteous has been offered, the prayers of the righteous ones have been heard, and the blood of the righteous has been admitted before the Lord of Spirits. Ch 48, the fount of righteousness: the Son of Man - the stay of the righteous: judgment of the kings and the mighty. Enoch saw the fountain of righteousness. The thirsty ones drink and become filled with wisdom. Their dwelling places become with the holy, righteous, and elect ones. At that hour the Son of Man was given a name, the Before-Time. He will become a staff for the righteous ones. He is the light of the gentiles, and he will become the hope of those who are sick in their hearts (Luke 2:32). All those on earth will worship him. He becomes the Chosen One. The righteous ones have despised this world of oppression. Blessed be the name of the Lord of Spirits. Ch 49 explores the power and wisdom of the Elect One. The spirit of wisdom gives thoughtfulness, knowledge, and strength. Ch 50, the glorification and victory of the righteous: the repentance of the gentiles and the mercy and judgment of the Lord of Spirits. Oppression cannot survive this judgment. Ch 51 the resurrection of the dead, and the separation by the judge of the righteous and the wicked. Sheol will return all the deposits she had received, and hell will give back all that it owes. The Lord of Spirits will choose the righteous and the holy ones from among the risen dead, for the day when they shall be selected and saved has arrived. The Elect One shall sit on the throne of the Lord of Spirits. The Lord of Spirits has glorified the Elect One and given him the secrets of wisdom. The Elect One has arisen. The earth shall rejoice. The righteous ones shall dwell upon the earth and the elect ones shall walk upon the earth. Ch 52 explores the six metal mountains and the Elect One. Everything he sees happening is by the authority of the Messiah, who will give orders and be praised on the earth. When the Elect One appears, these metal mountains will become like honeycombs. Ch 53–54.6 the valley of judgment: the angels of punishment: the communities of the Elect One. They shall fulfill the criminal deeds of their hands and eat all the produce of crime. Sinners will be destroyed from before the face of the Lord of the Spirits. The angels prepare all the chains of Satan, which are for the kings of the earth. They will be cast into the abyss, as Michael, Raphael, Gabriel, and Phanuel shall seize them on the great day of judgment and cast them into the furnace of fire so that the Lord of the Spirits may take vengeance on them on account of these oppressive deeds that they performed as messengers of Satan, leading astray those who dwell upon the earth. Ch 54.7.–55.2, Noachic fragment on the first world judgment. The Antecedent of Time repented and said he would not destroy the earth this way again with the flood. Ch 55.3.–56.4, final judgment of Azazel, the Watchers, and their children. The age of their leading others astray shall end. Ch 56.5 – 57.3 shows the last struggle of the heathen powers against Israel. A spirit of unrest shall come upon the kings. Sheol shall open its mouth and swallow sinners in the presence of the elect ones. 

Chapters 58-69 are the third parable. Ch 58 the blessedness of the saints. Peace be to the righteous ones in the peace of the Eternal Lord. It shall be told to the holy ones in heaven that they should scrutinize the mysteries of righteousness, the gift of faith. Darkness has ended, there is no longer need to count the days, and light shall be permanent before the Lord of the Spirits. Ch 59 the lights and the thunder. Ch 60 quaking of the heaven: Behemoth and Leviathan: the elements. The Antecedent of Time sits on his throne. Michael told him the mercy of the Antecedent of Time has been great with the people of the earth. Ch 61 angels go off to measure Paradise: the Judgment of the Righteous by the Elect One: the Praise of the Elect One and of God. The mercy of the Lord of the Spirits is great in quantity and long-suffering. Ch 62 judgment of the kings and the mighty: blessedness of the righteous. Then pain shall come upon the kings and the mighty as on a woman in travail with birth pangs – when she is giving birth the child enters the mount of the tomb and she suffers. Pain shall seize them when they see the Son of Man sitting on the throne of his glory. The Son of Man was concealed from the beginning, and the Most high one revealed him to the elect ones. The congregation of the holy ones shall stand before him. The ruling class shall fall before the Son of Man and plead for mercy. The elect ones shall rejoice at the punishments delivered to the ruling class. The elect ones shall cease being downcast and rise with the Son of Man. Ch 63 the unavailing and hopeless repentance of the kings, rulers, and landlords. They shall be filled with shame before the Son of Man. Ch 64 vision of the fallen angels in the place of punishment. Ch 65 Enoch foretells to Noah the deluge and his own preservation. Ch 66 the Angels in charge of the flood bidden to hold them in check. Ch 67 God's promise to Noah: places of punishment of the angels and of the kings. The situation of Noah is without blame and is of true love. The judgment shall come upon them because they believe in the debauchery of their bodies and deny the spirit of the Lord. Ch 68 Michael and Raphael are astonished at the severity of the judgment. Ch 69 the names and functions of the (fallen Angels and) Satan: the secret oath. They had joy and blessed, glorified, and extolled, the Lord on account of the Son of Man being revealed to them. He shall never pass away or perish from the earth. The Son of Man has appeared, taken a seat upon the throne of glory. All evil shall disappear. 

Chapters 70-71 are the appendix. Ch 70 the final translation of Enoch. Ch 71 are two earlier visions of Enoch. One involved the fiery house and the other Antecedent of Days. So, there shall be length of days with the Son of Man, and peace to the righteous ones; his path is upright for the righteous, in the name of the Lord of the Spirits forever and ever.

 

Apocalypse of Abraham 9-32 (70-150 AD, Hebrew, a Jew in Israel) Pseudepigrapha 

            The Apocalypse of Abraham was composed between about 70–150 AD, it is of Jewish origin and is usually considered to be part of the Apocalyptic literature. It has survived only in Old Slavonic recensions—it is not regarded as scripture by Jews or any Christian group.

            Chapters 1-6, 8 are a polemic against idolatry. It is a story of the youth Abraham and his perception of idolatry. Abraham concludes that the idols are of his father are not gods, because some stone idols are crushed and a wooden idol is accidently consumed by fire. Abraham consequently beseeches God to reveal who God is, whereupon he hears the voice of God, which instructs Abraham to leave the house of his father.

            Chapters 9-32, minus gnostic interpolations, are the apocalypse. 

He is commanded to offer a sacrifice so that God will reveal important things that he has not seen (9:6). The God of eternity is the God who protects Abraham and his descendants.  God created the world. Here is the way the author introduces the revelation.

I will announce to you guarded things and you will see great things which you have not seen, because you desired to search for me, and I called you my beloved (Jas 2:23 refers to him as the friend of God). … And there I will show you the things which were made by the ages and by my word, and affirmed, created, and renewed. And I will announce to you in them what will come upon those who have done evil and just things in the race of humanity. (9:6, 9-10)

 

Ch 11 is a vision of the angel, the hair of his head white like snow (Rev 1:14). 

The chief of the fallen angels is Azazel (13:6). His power is over the earth because he has chosen it for his dwelling place. There is evil in the world, but it is not inevitable. The power of Azazel is limited since God does not permit him to tempt the righteous. He cannot seduce Abraham. He has no power over the body of the righteous. 

The author has confidence that God chose Abraham in 14:2, “Know from this that the Eternal One whom you have loved has chosen you.” Azazel is wrong if he thinks he can scorn justice and disperse the secret of heaven (14:4). He will be banished in the desert forever (14:5).

 God sends the angel Iaoel to lead Abraham to heaven (15:4). Angelology plays a large role in the text, with this Angel of God being the most important. His role is to protect and strengthen Abraham. In 15:6, the author refers to a “fiery Gehenna” enkindled. He sees seven visions. 

First, a vision of light and fiery angels (15:5-7). 

Second, a vision of the fire (17:1-3). 

Third, a vision of the throne (18:1-14). 

There is no other God in the universe than he one whom Abraham has searched for and who has loved him (19:3), so there is no ontological dualism. 

Fourth, a vision of the firmaments (19:4-9). As part of the cosmology, God shows Abraham the firmaments so that he may know that on no single expanse is there any other but the one for whom Abraham has searched for or who has loved him. 

Fifth, a vision of the world (21:2-7). Part of the cosmology is that Abraham sees the earth with the wicked as well as the garden of Eden with the just. He also has a vision of the abyss and paradise. 

And I saw there the earth and its fruit, and its moving things and its things that had souls, and its host of people and the impiety of their souls and their justification, and their pursuit of their works and the abyss and its torments, and its lower depths and the prediction in it. … And I saw there the garden of Eden and its fruits. (21:3)

 

The created world is good before the eyes of God (22:2), so there is no ontological dualism. God chose Israel as the people of God. The text addresses the matter of theodicy.

And I said, "Eternal, Mighty One, why then did you adjudge him such dominion that through his works he could ruin humankind on earth? … And I answered and said, "Eternal, Mighty One! Why did it please you to bring it about that evil should be desired in the heart of people, because you are angered at what was chosen by you … him who does useless things in your light. (23:12, 14)

 

Sixth, a vision of the seven sins of the world (24:3-25:2). 

Seventh, a vision of the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD. He analyzes the causes of the destruction of Jerusalem from a distinct perspective from that of IV Ezra, for the defeat was caused by the infidelity of Israel toward the covenant with God and the opportunistic politics of some leaders.

And I looked and I saw, and behold the picture swayed. And from its left side a crowd of heathens ran out and they captured the men, women, and children who were on its right side. And some slaughtered and others they kept with them. Behold, I saw them runner to them by way of four ascents and they burned the Temple with fire, and they plundered the holy things that were in it. And I said, "Eternal One, the people you received from me are being robbed by the hordes of the heathen. They are killing some and holding others as aliens, and they burned the Temple with fire and they are stealing and destroying the beautiful things which are in it. Eternal, Might One! If this is so, why now have you afflicted my heart and why will it be so? And he said to me, "Listen, Abraham, afflicted my heart and why will it be so? And he said to me, "Listen, Abraham, all that you have seen will happen on account of your seed who will continually provoke me because of the body which you saw and the murder in what was depicted in the Temple of jealousy, and everything you saw will be so. And I said, "Eternal, Mighty One! Let the evil works done in iniquity now pass by and make commandments in them more than his just works. For you can do this. And he said to me, "Again the time of justice will come upon them, at first through the holiness of kings. And I will judge with justice those whom I created earlier, to rule from them in them. And from these same ones will come people who will have regard for them, as I announced to you and you saw. (27)

 

Finally, God announces the punishment of the gentiles through ten plagues (29-30). The age of ungodliness endures twelve periods (29:2). After the last period comes the final judgment, which precedes the redemption of the just. Chapter 30 has God announcing the ten plagues upon the earth.

 

But while He was still speaking, I found myself upon the earth. And I said: “O Eternal, [Mighty One], I am no longer in the glory in which I was (while) on high, and what my soul longed to understand in mine heart I do not understand.” And He said to me: “What is desired in thine heart I will tell thee, because thou hast sought to see the ten plagues which I have prepared for the heathen, and have prepared beforehand at the passing over of the twelfth hour of the earth. Hear what I divulge to thee, so shall it come to pass: the first (is) pain of great distress; the second, conflagration of many cities; the third, destruction and pestilence of animals; the fourth, hunger of the whole world and of its people; the fifth by destruction among its rulers, destruction by earthquake and the sword; the sixth, multiplication of hail and snow; the seventh, the wild beasts will be their grave; the eighth, hunger and pestilence will alternate with their destruction; the ninth, punishment by the sword and flight in distress; the tenth, thunder and voices and destructive earthquake.

 

This brings the victory of the just (31-32). God chose Israel as the people of God. God will give the nation victory over its enemies. The chosen one will gather the dispersed people. God and the chosen one will punish the heathens. The apostates will be burned through the fire of Azazel. The Temple and the sacrifices will be restored. The doctrine of the resurrection is absent.

Testament of Abraham (75-125 AD, Egypt) Pseudepigrapha

            The Testament of Abraham was originally written in Greek. The author was Jewish and lived in Alexandria, Egypt. Its closest parallels are the Testament of Job, III Baruch, II Enoch, and the Apocalypse of Moses. It was preserved in Christian circles but shows only occasional Christian influence. 

Within the Judaism of the time, it represents a kind of lowest common denominator form of Judaism, cosmopolitan humanity. It testifies to the existence of a universalistic and generalize Judaism, in which good works consisted of such obvious virtues as charity and hospitality, coupled with avoidance of obvious moral sins like murder, adultery, and robbery, according to which Jew and gentile are judged by how well they observe these ethical requirements. It presents Judaism as a religion of commonplace moral values, which nevertheless insists both on the strictness of the judgment of God and on divine mercy and compassion. It sees no distinction between Jew and gentile. The sins mentioned are heinous by the definition of anyone. Everyone is judged by the same standard. The only means of atonement are repentance and premature death. This view contrasts sharply with IV Maccabees. Both the Testament of Joband II Enoch stress the significance of sacrifice. The main purpose of the author was to describe the judgment scene, indicating the basis all individuals would gain either life or punishment. This stresses the value of good works, the efficacy of repentance, and the justice and mercy of God. The soteriology is simple: if sins now repented of or punished by premature death outweigh or outnumber righteous deeds, the soul is sentenced to punishment. If righteous deeds predominate, the soul goes to life. If they are equally balanced, the balance can be tilted in favor of life by intercessory prayer. God is merciful and desires that sinners repent. If they deserve punishment, God is righteous and will punish. The uniqueness of the book is that everyone, Jew or gentile, are judged on the same basis. 

When it is time for Abraham to die, God sends the archangel Michael to inform him to prepare for death and to make a will. It is hoped that Abraham will voluntarily surrender his soul to Michael. Abraham, is recalcitrant and refuses to go, requesting first to be shown all the inhabited world. After consulting with God, Michal conducts Abraham on such a tour. The tour is primarily of the place of judgment to which souls go for sentencing. Abraham, seeing people engaged in various sins, calls down death upon them, but God tells Michael to stop the tour. God, unlike Abraham, is compassionate and postpones the death of sinners so that they may repent. Abraham is then conducted to the place of judgment to witness the fate of souls after they depart from their bodies, so that he may repent of his severity. He learns that souls are tried in three ways: fire, deeds written in books, and balance. He learns that there are three judgments: by Abel, but the twelve tribes of Israel, and by God. Abraham intercedes on behalf of a soul that is judged to be neither wicked nor righteous and, repenting for his former harshness, he then pleads on behalf of those whom he had caused to die. God saves the former and restores the latter. Abraham is taken home, but he still declines to surrender his soul. this reluctance to die comes from Moses traditions. God finally sends Death, who Abraham his ferocity and who at last take his soul by a deception. The soul of Abraham is conducted to heaven by angels. 

            This story has a longer version, which is closer to the original, and a shorter version, which is closer to the wording of the original. 

The text describes the Abraham in terms of Jewish piety.

 

Abraham … lived in quietness, gentleness, and righteousness, and the righteous  was very hospitable. For he pitched his tent at the crossroads of the oak of Mamre and welcomed everyone - rich and poor, kings, and rulers, the crippled and the helpless, friends and strangers, neighbors and passerby - all on equal terms did the pious, entirely holy, righteous, and hospitable Abraham welcome. (1:1-3)

 

I have not seen upon earth a man like him - merciful, hospitable, righteous, truthful, God-fearing, refraining from every evil deed. (4:6)

 

Yet, the text also finds Abraham proclaiming his unworthiness.

 

You have thought it altogether worthy yourself to come to me, a sinner and your completely worthless servant. (9:3)

 

Abraham wants to know the future.

 

While I am yet in this body I wish to see all the inhabited world and all the created things which you established, master, through one world, and when I have seen these things, then, if I depart from life, I shall have no sorrow. (9:6)

 

The text expresses the nature of the path toward salvation.

 

The first way was strait and narrow and the other broad and spacios. … And they saw many souls from being driven by angels and being led through the broad gate, and they saw a few other souls and they were being brought by angels through the narrow gate. (11:2, 5)

 

An interesting dialogue occurs in Chapter 14, in which Abraham enquires about the judgment of a soul. The soul had an equal balance of righteous and sinful deeds. Abraham discovers that to be saved, one needed to find a righteous deed. Abraham prays. God listens to the prayer and delivers the soul. In chapter 15, Abraham refuses to follow an angel that intends to lead him to his death.

 

---

[1] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991), Volume Three, p. 443)

[2] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991), Volume One, p. 207)

[3] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991), Volume Three, p. 567)

[4] (Sanders, Jesus and Judaism 1985), p. 81)

[5] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991), Volume One, p. 402)

Marcel Proust (1871-1922)

            

Ecclesiastes is a profoundly modern book. The author considers that the reality and presence of God are far from obvious in this quite human world. Ecclesiastes 1:2, 12-14; 2:18-23, lays out the central theme of this remarkable book: Everything is vanity in this world, and taking pleasure in all of life, labor as well as leisure, is to accept one of God’s greatest gifts to human beings. Interpreters remain divided on whether such a view constitutes pessimism, realism or a courageous blending of the two.

“Vanity of vanities” (hevel havalim) is the traditional translation, but other translations attempt to capture the force of the expression (e.g., NIV’s “‘Meaningless! Meaningless!’ says the Teacher, ‘Utterly meaningless!’” and the New Century Translation’s “Useless! Useless! Completely useless!” Does the phrase describe the profoundly ephemeral nature of human existence sub specie aeternitatis (that is, “under the form of eternity,” and hence, simply states a fact), or does it denote a more negative view of the futility of all human striving, which leaves as little impact, ultimately, as the passing breeze (“a chasing after wind,” 1:14)? The answer depends not on one’s translation of the phrase but on one’s interpretation of the book. What makes objects or actions described as havel bad is less their positive malevolence and more their evanescent, unsubstantial, and illusory nature. Thus, when Jeremiah speaks of idols as havel (10:15), he means not that they are capable of positive evil, which they are not, but rather that they are “worthless” or even “worse than worthless” because their devotees have imbued them with a power they do not have. Similarly, when Proverbs 21:6 describes wealth gained through deceit as havel-niddaph, “a fleeting vapor,” it is not that evil inheres in the wealth itself, but rather that the security illicit wealth provides is illusory and will eventually lead to ruin in the eventual course of justice.

I think of Ecclesiastes when I read Marcel Proust (1871-1922). He wrestles with how human beings live their time. He especially considers how human beings experience their time as lost and how they might regain it. Three philosophers, Maurice Merleau-ponty, Paul Ricoeur, and Charles Taylor, have helped me consider the significance of the work of Proust as modern people wrestle with their secular experience of time. 

Proust wrote À la recherche du temps perdu, Remembrance of Things Past, now translated as In Search of Lost Time (1913-1927) in seven volumes. I read it because it was on the list of books that I should read sometime in my life. In an old collection of all seven books, it runs 2200 pages plus. One can read the Wikipedia article for background on him and a different article for a summary of this book.  

In the title, temps perdu has the double meaning of wasted time and time irretrievably lost, beyond recall, in which we pass as if we had never been.[1]

     An effective way to read the complete set of seven books is to read the first and last carefully. The reason is that the last book contains a revelation that will change the way one understands a story that slowly unwinds in segments. 

     One of the issues scholars face is the nature of the “I” we find in this long book. Scholars wrestle with how much of the narrator is Marcel Proust and how much is fiction. In the context of this novel, it seems appropriate to approach the narrative “I” as fictional, regardless of its connection with the historical Proust. Thus, one reading hypothesis is that the narrator-hero is a fictive entity supporting the tale about time that is this novel.[2]

One might also adopt the reading hypothesis that the long novel is in the form of an ellipse, one focus being the search and the second the visitation. The tale about time is the tale that creates the relation between these two foci of the novel. The character of the novel arises out of the apprenticeship to signs (defined by Gilles Deleuze as signs of the social world, signs of life, signs of sensuous impressions, and signs of art) and to the irruption of involuntary memories. It represents the form of interminable wandering, interrupted by the sudden illumination that retrospectively transforms the entire narrative in the invisible history of a vocation. Time becomes something that is at stake again as soon as it is a question of making the inordinately long apprenticeship to signs correspond to the suddenness of a belatedly recounted visitation, which retrospectively characterizes the entire quest as lost time.[3]

Some scholars think that the narrative is not primary. Rather, Proust has developed a philosophy of time, rooted in Schelling and Schopenhauer, but through the perspective of his teachers, Seailles, Darlu, and Tarde. This would mean that in contrast to the notion of a narrative rooted in the life of Proust to a narrative rooted in the thought of Proust.[4]

The hero of this book is Time. What is it “to be”? His answer is not a succession of chronological time, but the past as it erupts into our present. In a sense, he applies the new physics, the notion in quantum theory that observation changes the thing observed, to the writing of a novel. He has placed the theory of relativity into the form of a novel. Time is not the smooth flow of discrete events, but an ever-changing continuum. Memory is not under our control. Small events can reawaken a stream of memories and almost forgotten experiences. Reality becomes elusive and therefore sad, evanescent, and puzzling. Time turns upon itself. Our only reality is the aspect of things remembered. Yet, Proust also shows the decline of the middle-class French society in the period before WWI. He analyzes the frustrating nature of love, and particularly homosexual love.[5] Proust has made his primary subject the exploration of the personality as the interpenetration of its past and present self-awareness defines it.[6]

Thus, this work is a tale about time, since in it, the very experience of time is at stake in its structural transformations. Further, it explores uncharted modes of dissonant harmony, which affects the narrative composition, but more importantly, the lived experience of the characters in the narrative. Such varieties of temporal experience only fiction can explore, doing so in a way that that refigures ordinary temporality. Finally, it explores the relation of time to eternity and between eternity and death.[7]

Proust has a painstaking way of seeking to reveal the mystery of the world and of reason. He has attentiveness and wonder, demand for awareness, the will to seize the meaning of the world or of history as that meaning comes into being.[8] Proust rejects the Aristotelian priority of plot over character. The plot attempts to embody the ordinary processes of life. In so doing, it depends on the characters and the development of their relationships.[9] The chronological order is primary.[10] He engages in intense introspection, a quality he shares with many novelists who have moved in the direction of the subjective and psychological. However, along the way, he reveals the external world of the Third Republic.

In the opening of Swann’s Way, Proust refers to awakening from sleep, his mind struggling in an unsuccessful attempt to discover where he was. His body was still too heavy with sleep to move. Yet, his body would try to construe the form that its tiredness took as an orientation of its various members. His body tried to induce a piecing together and giving a name. Its memory of ribs, knees, and shoulders offered it a whole series of rooms in which it had at one time or another time of sleep. The unseen walls kept changing, adapting themselves to the shape of each successive room that it remembered, whirling madly through the darkness. His body loyally preserved from the past an impression that his mind should never have forgotten, brought before his eyes the glimmering flame of the night-light in its bowl of Bohemian glass. It called to mind the home of his great-aunt, in distant days, at the moment of waking, that seemed present without being clearly defined. Proust shows that the part played by the body in memory is comprehensible only if memory is an effort to reopen time based on the implications contained in the present. The body is our permanent means of taking up attitudes, and thus constructing pseudo-presents as the medium of our communication with as well as with space. The function of the body in remembering is that of projection. The body arrays the former attitude into the panorama of the past, projecting an intention to move into actual movement, because the body is a power of natural expression.[11]

The first volume is an account of time lost. Experiences of childhood seem lost. The overture seems lost. Swann in love constructs a narrative of love gnawed away by illusion, suspicion, and disappointment. Love passes through the anguish of expectation, the bite of jealousy, and the sorrow accompanying its decline, and the indifference that meets it death. If one were to stop reading here, lost time would be the paradoxical seeking in reality for pictures stored in one’s memory, which must inevitably lose the charm that comes to them from memory and from their not being apprehended by the senses. The novel would have limited itself to a hopeless struggle to combat the ever-increasing gap that generates forgetfulness.[12]

By communicating with the world, we communicate with ourselves. We hold time in its entirety. We are present to ourselves because we are present to the world. In addition, consciousness takes root in being and time by taking up a situation. Consciousness is indivisible power and distinct manifestation. Consciousness is temporalization, that is, a self-anticipatory movement, a flow that never leaves itself. Novelists might see consciousness as a multiplicity of psychic facts among which they try to establish causal relations. For example, Proust shows how the love of Swann for Odette causes the jealousy that modifies his love. Swann, always anxious to win her from any rival has no time to look at Odette truly. The consciousness of Swann is not a lifeless setting in which psychic facts are produced from outside. What we have is not jealousy aroused by love and exerting its own counter-influence, but a certain way of loving in which the whole destiny of that love one can discern at a glance. Swann has a liking for the person of Odette. Swann has a liking for the spectacle that she is, for her way of looking, of modulating her voice, and for the way a smile comes to her lips. For Proust, to have a liking for someone is the feeling of being shut out of the life of the beloved, and of wanting to force one’s way in and take complete possession of it. The love Swann has does not cause him to feel jealously. His love is already jealousy. It had been so from the start. The feeling of pleasure Swann had in looking at Odette bore its degeneration within itself, since it was the pleasure of being the only one to do so. The set of psychic facts and casual relationships merely translates in an external fashion a certain view that Swann takes of Odette, a certain way of belonging to another. The jealous love of Swann has a relation to the rest of his behavior, in which case it might well appear as itself a manifestation of an even more general existential structure, which would be his personality.[13] Proust will show that repression consists in the entering of the subject upon a certain curse of action, such as a love affair, in his encountering on this course some barrier. Since he has the strength neither to surmount the obstacle nor to abandon the enterprise, he remains imprisoned in the attempt and uses up his strength indefinitely renewing it in spirit. Time remains open to the same impossible future, if not in his explicit thoughts, at any rate in his actual being. One present among all presents acquires an exceptional value. We continue to be the person who once entered on this adolescent affair, or the one who once lived in this parental universe. New perceptions, new emotions, replace the old ones. However, this process of renewal touches only the content of our experience and not its structure. One arrests personal time. The past is our true present and does not leave us. It remains hidden behind our gaze. The traumatic experience survives. The privileged world loses its substance and eventually becomes an experience of dread. All repression is the transition from first person existence to an abstraction of that existence, which lives on the memory of having had the memory of a former experience. In fact, repression is a universal phenomenon, revealing our condition as incarnate beings by relating it to the temporal structure of being in the world.[14]

The greatest service done by expression is that it brings it to life in an organization of the signs of the medium of expression. The musical meaning of a sonata is inseparable from the sounds that are its vehicle. Before we hear it, we cannot anticipate it, and after hearing it all we can do is carry ourselves back to the moment of experiencing it. During the performance, the notes are not only the signs of the sonata, but the sonata is there through them. The sonata enters them. We can see this in the whole experience of Swann in Swann’s Way, in which he remembers a phrase of a sonata, and finally discovers the entire piece and hears it played. Another form of expression is the play. In Part I of The Guermantes Way, Proust has the experience of the one he knew, Berma, acting as Phaedra. It appeared to him as the highest point of expression of ease and naturalness. Aesthetic expression confers on what it expresses an existence in itself. It installs it in nature as a thing perceived and accessible to all. To put in the reverse consideration, aesthetic expression plucks the signs, whether the actor or the notes, from their empirical existence and bears them off into another world. In this sense, the process of expression brings the meaning into being or makes it effective. Thus, one is not merely translating the meaning of being but conferring meaning.[15]

What the relationship is between experience, body, and consciousness is not as simple as one might think. We can hold in our consciousness those who are absent. Proust can recognize the death of his grandmother, yet, without losing her, if he can keep her on the horizon of his life.[16] For Proust, intellectual memory limits itself to a description of a past idea, from which it extracts characteristics or communicable meaning rather than discovering a structure. However, it would not be memory if the object that it constructs were not still held by a few intentional threads to the horizon of the lived-through past, and to that past itself as we should rediscover it if we were to delve beyond these horizons and reopen time.[17]

What we have throughout the course of this long work is the apprenticeship to signs, defined by Gilles Deleuze as signs of the social world, signs of life, signs of sensuous impressions, and signs of art. Thus, what is it to regain lost time? What difficulties must the act of regaining lost time overcome? Why does their resolution bear the mark of an ambiguity? 

In a famous passage Marcel Proust muses about food’s power to unlock memory. Visiting his mother, she offers him tea, into which he dips a madeleine cookie.

 

No sooner had the warm liquid mixed with the crumbs touched my palate than a shudder ran through me, and I stopped, intent upon the extraordinary thing that was happening to me. An exquisite pleasure had invaded my senses, something isolated, detached, with no suggestion of its origin. And at once the vicissitudes of life had become indifferent to me, its disasters innocuous, its brevity illusory — this new sensation having had on me the effect which love has of filling me with a precious essence; or rather this essence was not in me it was me. I had ceased now to feel mediocre, contingent, mortal. Whence could it have come to me, this all-powerful joy? I sensed that it was connected with the taste of the tea and the cake, but that it infinitely transcended those savours, could, no, indeed, be of the same nature. Whence did it come? What did it mean? How could I seize and apprehend it?

 

Searching his memory, Proust recalls how, as a boy, his Aunt Léonie used to give him that very same treat.

 

The sight of the little madeleine had recalled nothing to my mind before I tasted it; perhaps because I had so often seen such things in the meantime, without tasting them, on the trays in pastry-cooks’ windows, that their image had dissociated itself from those Combray days to take its place among others more recent; perhaps because of those memories, so long abandoned and put out of mind, nothing now survived, everything was scattered; the shapes of things, including that of the little scallop-shell of pastry, so richly sensual under its severe, religious folds, were either obliterated or had been so long dormant as to have lost the power of expansion which would have allowed them to resume their place in my consciousness.

But when from a long-distant past nothing subsists, after the people are dead, after the things are broken and scattered, taste and smell alone, more fragile but more enduring, more unsubstantial, more persistent, more faithful, remain poised a long time, like souls, remembering, waiting, hoping, amid the ruins of all the rest; and bear unflinchingly, in the tiny and almost impalpable drop of their essence, the vast structure of recollection.

 

For answers, let us move to the second part of the twin foci of the ellipse that is the form of this novel to the final volume, “The Past Recaptured,” (“Time Regained”). It begins with the extinguishing of desire. He has a loss of curiosity that might cause him not to write. One must give up the desire to relive the past if one is to regain lost time. The death of the desire to see things again is accompanied by the death of the desire to possess the women he has loved. He grafts his meditation on time onto the moments of happiness and the premonitory signs. At a deeper level, the speculation on time has its anchor in the narrative as a founding event in the vocation of the writer. This appears to be extra-temporal time, and thus, at a distance from the narrative itself. It has its origin in the thought of the narrator. Yet, the extra-temporal dimension is only at the threshold of time regained. Only the decision to write ends the tension between the narrative of time and the extra-temporal reflection on time. The extra-temporal is a meditation on the origin of aesthetic creation. It becomes a contemplative moment. Time regained in the sense of lost time revived arises out of fixing this contemplative moment in a lasting work. Artistic creation offers its mediation. The decision to write transposes the extra-temporal character of the original vision into the temporality of the resurrection of time lost. In this sense, the work of Proust narrates the transition from one meaning of time regained to the other, and it is for this reason that it is a tale about time. Time becomes the artist that works slowly.[18] Another way to say this is that the narrator recovers the full meaning of his past and thus restores the “lost” time. He has no longer wasted the time he lived, for now it has meaning, as the time of preparation for the work of the writer who will give shape to the unity of his life. The irretrievable past he has now recovered in its unity with the life yet to live. Here is an example of how the modern person wants the future to redeem the past, as the future makes the past part of a life story that has a sense or purpose. One can take up the past in a meaningful unity.[19] This narrated unity is one in which Proust has struck a deep chord in contemporary imagination.[20] Yet, the restoration of time comes at the cost of a pitiless destruction of the illusions of love.[21] Outside of this epiphany, and prior to it, he cannot bring his life together into the usual story of achievement. Only by cohering in a way that cuts across time, which joins widely separated moments of epiphany through memory, can his live have a sense that forms the basis of a recovery of the past that stops the wasting of time.[22] The epiphany occurs between an event and its recurrence, through memory. The original experience hinders the epiphany, for the experience dominates our attention and obstructs the vision behind it. Only in the recall of memory can we see behind it to what the experience reveals.[23]

Proust has presented us with his formula of redemption. We might answer that on the level of style, we have an overarching metaphor. The narrator will say that what we call reality is a certain connection between these immediate sensations and the memories that envelop us simultaneously with them. The metaphorical relation, brought to light by the elucidation of happy moments, becomes the matrix for all the relations in which two distinct objects raised to their essence and liberated form the contingencies of time. The entire apprenticeship to sights, which contributes to the length of this work, falls under the law that is apprehended in the privileged examples of a few premonitory signs, already bearing the twofold sense that the intelligence must clarify. In this sense, time regained is time lost eternalized by metaphor.[24] At the level of vision, we have recognition. Vision contains recognition that is the very mark of the extra-temporal on lost time. Throughout the book are optical errors, which take on the sense of a misunderstanding. Non-recognition carries with it a dance with death. The hero even fails to recognize Gilberte, placing the entire foregoing quest retrospectively at once under the sign of a comedy of optical errors and on the path of a project of integral recognition. Thus, the meeting between the hero and the daughter of Gilberte is an ultimate recognition scene, to the extent that the young girl incarnates the reconciliation between the two ways, that of Swan and that of the Guermantes. What we can see here is that metaphor and recognition share the common role of elevating two impressions to the level of essence, without abolishing their difference.[25] All of this suggests a third answer the question of regaining lost time, and it consists in regaining the lost impression. One can lose the impression in immediate pleasure, making it a prisoner to its external object. The initial stage of the rediscovery is that of the internalization of the impression. A second stage is the transposition of the impression to a law or idea. A third stage is the inscription of the spiritual equivalent in a work of art. There is supposed to be a fourth stage to which the narrator refers future readers. He says they ought not to be his readers, but readers of themselves, his book becoming a magnifying glass to furnish the reader with the means of reading that which is within them. He admits that he wants to maintain a difficult balance between the impression and the deciphering of signs. The impression maintains the truthfulness of the whole picture. Life becomes an inner book of unknown symbols. The unwritten book is the only book that belongs to us, our true life, and our reality as we felt it to be. On the other hand, reading the book of life is an act of creation in which no one can do for us or even collaborate with us. The narrator says that real life is literature. However, most people do not see it because they do not seek to shed light upon it. In a sense, then, this entire work is a search for the lost impression. Time regained is the metaphor that encloses differences in the necessary links of a well-wrought style. Time regained is also the recognition that crowns vision. Time regained is the impression regained that reconciles life and literature. Life is the way of time lost. Literature is the way of the extra-temporal. Time regained expresses the recovery of lost time in the extra-temporal. Impression regained expresses the recovery of life in the work of art.[26]

In Chapter 3, he refers to “fragments of existence removed outside the realm of time.” However, “this contemplation, although part of eternity, was transitory.” Such is the flavor of his reflections throughout the volumes. He has recapitulated the disappointments in his life, as far as it had been lived. The “real essence” of his life is not in action. He learned that “disappointment in a journey and disappointment in a love affair” were “different aspects assumed in varying situations by our inability to find our real selves in physical enjoyment or material activity.” The work of art was particularly important. We are not free in the presence of the work of art to do with it as we please. It existed prior to us. We should seek to discover the work of art, even as we seek to discover laws in science. Yet, when art enabled us to make the discovery, it discloses what we ought to hold as precious, while at the same time it remains unknown to us. He admits that regardless of how short our lives may be, “it is only while we are suffering that our thoughts … bring up within our range of vision … all the boundless world … but of which we had no view from our ill-placed window.” We may think some people live without suffering, but suffering is the window to the real life we live. As Proust reflects upon the “real essence” of his life, the real or true life we live, he does so in a way that remains consistent with what Aristotle called “living well” or “the good life.”[27] Proust goes further in saying that people who cause us to suffer through the love we have for them are people we should associate with divinity. The person is a fragmentary reflection, the lowest step of the approach of a temple or pyramid, that grants us joy in place of the sorrow we were suffering. The entire art of living consists in making use of those who cause us suffering as so many steps enabling us to draw nearer to the divine form and therefore to the people of our lives. Thus, as Merleau-Ponty puts it, our past is not reducible to the express memories that we are able to contemplate. If so, we could sever our existence from the past and contemplate those threads that are present. We need to enjoy some other way of recognizing the threads of past that opens the past to us directly. Every present as it arises is driven into time like a wedge and stakes its claim to eternity. Eternity is not another order of time, but the atmosphere of time.[28] We see an illustration of this in the appearance of the daughter of Gilberte Swann and Robert de Saint-Loup, symbolizing the reconciliation of the two ways, that of Swann through her mother and that of the Guermantes way through her father. He states that he thought her incredibly beautiful, rich in hopes, full of laughter, formed from those which years that that he had lost. She was like his own youth. The reconciliation here suggests that artistic creation has a pact with youth. Art, unlike love, is stronger than death. The idea of Time becomes a spur, for it was time to begin if he wished to attain in the course of his life that it had been worth living. It now seemed even more worth living, now that he seemed to see that this life that we live in half-darkness has some light. One can restore every moment we distort to its pristine shape. One can realize the course of a life within the confines of a book.[29]

Proust could now see his life as summed up in the notion of vocation. He thought he could recapture time “by descending more deeply within himself.” He had a conception of time as incarnate, of past years as “still close held within us.” He concludes that he had “a feeling of profound fatigue at the realization that all this long stretch of time not only had been uninterruptedly lived, thought, secreted by me, that it was my life, my very self, but also that I must … keep it closely by me, that it upheld me, that I was perched on its dizzying summit, that I could not move without carrying it about with me.”  The previous sentence, shortened as it was, is typical of his writing. He concludes by saying that his conception of time may give humanity the appearance of monstrous creatures. They occupy “in Time a place far more considerable than they occupy in space, extending boundlessly since they touch simultaneously epochs of their lives … so widely separated from one another in Time.”

David Brooks indicates how deeply this notion of vocation appeals to us today. In describing “a moral bucket list, the experiences one should have on the way toward the richest possible inner life,” he describes the need for a “call within the call.” 

 

We all go into professions for many reasons: money, status, security. But some people have experiences that turn a career into a calling. These experiences quiet the self. All that matters is living up to the standard of excellence inherent in their craft.[30]

 

Such a notion has religious overtones. People have a calling from God to serve in their unique way. The calling may change and evolve over a lifetime. Some may have a calling to parent young children at one stage, and then have a calling to be leaders beyond the home. Some may serve God in “secular” careers, bringing their sense of the divine to work. Such notions are quite “normal” in the world of the church today.

The book makes us hear two narrative voices. The hero tells his worldly, amorous, sensuous, aesthetic adventures as they occur. The narrative marches toward the future, even when the hero is reminiscing. It has the form of the “future in the past.” The hero receives the revelation of the sense of his past life as the invisible history of a vocation. This way of looking at it preserves the event-like character of the visitation. The second voice is the narrator, who says, more than a hundred times, “as we shall see later.” The narrator gives the meaning to the experience recounted by the hero, that is, time regained and time lost.[31] This experience, which redeems time, is a limit experience, unfolding in its own world. In other words, another author could have a different limit experience within the world of that story. Time allows eternity to surpass it. In this way, the tale about time becomes a tale of time and its other. Fiction allows for an unlimited number of thought experiments. It will not tolerate censorship. His supra-temporal experience of Beauty is an initiation.[32]

Between the twin foci of the ellipse of this work is traversed time. Traversal marks the transition from the extra-temporal, glimpsed in contemplation, to Time embodied the extra-temporal is a point of a passage, transforming the fragments into duration. However, this does not suggest the vision of Bergson of a duration free of all extension. It confirms the dimensional character of time. It moves from the idea of a distance that separates to that of a distance that joins. The final metaphor is that of an accumulated duration that is beneath us. The narrator-hero sees people perched upon living stilts that never cease to grow until sometimes they become taller than church steeples. He sees himself perched upon the summit. Time lost is contained in time regained. More importantly, Time carries us within it. The book closes, not with victory, but with a sense of the weariness and terror of life. Time regained is also death regained. The book generates an interim time, which is that of a work he has yet to accomplish and one that death might destroy.[33]

This work offers the opportunity to explore the imaginative variations produced by fiction and lived time on the level of history. It reveals an aporia when approached by phenomenology as one opens up a split through reflecting thinking between phenomenological time and cosmic time. In their manner of relating to this split, history and fiction begin to differ. When we find in this work is an unusual variation on the polarity between the time of consciousness and the time of the world. The apprenticeship to signs involves the world and consciousness. The cleavage that results opposes time lost to time regained. The time lost is first past time, prey to the universal decay of things. This work is an exhausting struggle against the effacement of traces and therefore against forgetfulness. One also loses time as time dissipates among signs not yet recognized as such, destined to be reintegrated within the great work of recapitulation. Finally, dispersed time is lost, remaining in suspension as long as it has not yet become the thing that one must regain. Until the conjunction of quest and illumination, of apprenticeship and visitation, this work does know where it is headed. The work will have the feeling of disorientation and disenchantment of lost time, since it has not yet received recapitulation into the stately design of a work of art.[34]  It illustrates the connection of coincidence as the hero advances toward an uncertain future, and that of the narrator, who forgets nothing. Repetition achieves its significance in the long meditation of this work of art.[35] In this great meditation on time, the extra-temporal realm of aesthetic essences may be a source of deception and illusion. The writer has a vocation, so eternity transforms itself from a bewitchment into a gift. It confers the power of bringing back days gone by. Death and eternity still have a relationship. We see this in the death-like figures seated around the table of the prince de Guermantes at the dinner party following the great revelation. The death of the author threatens the experience of eternity. The combat of eternity and death continues other guises. Time regained through the grace of art is still only an armistice.[36]

This work has a way of putting a modern myth onto its notion of time. It presents hasty and destructive time, but contrasts it with the slow working of Time, the artist. Yet, in both cases, time needs a body to externalize itself and become visible.[37]

The work ends with the words “in the dimension of time.” “In” here means that time contains all things, including the narrative that tries to make sense of the tension between destructive Time and Time the artist.[38]

For my taste, Charles Taylor has identified why this discussion of time as experienced in a secular culture is so important. Charles Taylor discusses the unquiet frontiers of modernity.[39] Among them is our sense of time and the past. The era in which the West lives is a purely secular time understanding allows us to imagine society horizontally, unrelated to any “high points,” where the ordinary sequence of events touches higher time. The radical horizonality is what is implied in the direct access society, where each member is immediate to the whole. He refers to the notion of disenchantment. Time is an instrument a resource one manages, measures, cut up, and regulates. The instrumental stance homogenizes. It defines segments but recognizes no qualitative differences. As he sees it, such a stance is the rigid time frame in which we all live. Secular time is simultaneity, and succession shapes our sense of time-ordering in which there is no place for higher times. Yet, we do not simply have a homogeneous, empty time experience, for humans could not live exclusively in this. Secular time continues to have marks through which we orient ourselves. The primary way in which we meet this challenge is narrative, a more intense telling of our stories as individuals and as societies. Thus, autobiography is prominent. Our interest in history grows intense, especially to make sense of our national stories. Narration is one way of gathering time. Moments are kairotic in that rise out of the narrative and grant meaning. We live with certain cycles, routines, and recurring forms in our lives. We might think of the daily round, the week, the year with its seasons, time of heightened activity, and vacations. We also live through narrations of change growth, development, and realization of potential. One might think of once-for-all moments of founding, revolution, and liberation. The cycle and the narration have a complex relationship and depend upon each other. Pre-modern outlooks looked for the narration in a higher time or in eternity. In the modern world, the single reality giving meaning to the repeatable cycles is a narrative of human self-realization. Thus, one might view it as the story of progress, reason, freedom, civilization, human rights, or the maturity of a culture or nation. The routines of disciplined work, the excitement of innovation, the building of a nation, have a deeper meaning through their place in the bigger story. Among the issues he sees is a certain trendy post-modernism in which the narratives of the modern world have come under attack. Yet, even this approach has a grand narrative: ONCE we were into grand stories, but NOW we have realized their emptiness and proceed to the next stage. In any case, as he sees it, the narrative of human progress is so much part of us that it would be frightening to live in a world devoid of it. Nietzsche is a reminder that such a story has always been under attack. Running through all attacks on the narrative of modernity is the specter of meaninglessness, the denial of transcendence, heroism, and deep feeling. It leaves us with a view of human life that is empty, cannot inspire commitment, offers nothing worthwhile, and cannot answer the craving for goals to which we can dedicate ourselves. Human activity and thought will inspire nothing but a cosmic yawn. Before modernity, it would have seemed bizarre to fear an absence of meaning. Religion seeks to address the concern for meaning by suggesting that it provides the narrative context for meaning and purpose that a secular sense of time cannot. Part of the issue is that the narratives of the success of modernity, such as its science, technology, freedom, economic freedom and innovation, have what some view as a dark side. Unsupported by a believable narrative, the disciplined routines of everyday life become problematic as well. They seem like a prison for the banal. They fail to integrate our lives. They fail to unite our live across repeatable instances. Our sense of the purpose of everyday time disintegrates. 

In this context, Proust, as Taylor sees it sees it, is the most brilliant articulator of the lost connection across time. He is also the inventor of new experience-immanent ways of restoring it. He provides a new sense of time and memory. This work builds towards the creation of a subtle language in which one can formulate this sense. He offers a sense of a higher time, built out of the sensibility of a modern living in the flow of secular time. The connections he makes between widely spaced moments appear in the mundane sensual experience of the madeleine, and the rocking paving stone. What arises through the sense of loss in is the need to rediscover a lived time beneath or beyond the objectified time-resource of the disciplined order of civilization. Lived experience is the means through which we either find the way to break out of the iron cage of everydayness or transfigure the world, or to reconnect the lost time. 

 Let us come back to Ecclesiastes.

The hidden character of the action of God in daily life, which wisdom accepted, can lead to skepticism as to whether God is present active at all. For Ecclesiastes, the action of God has become so hidden that the author cannot see it. The point where contact with the action of Yahweh in history tended to be lost was the point when faith experienced its gravest danger. A form of skepticism arose unique to Israel. It did not doubt that Yahweh existed. It doubted the readiness of Yahweh to interfere in history or in the life of the individual. One might note Psalm 90 in this regard. The period of the monarchy had already broken with the idea that Yahweh acted in dramatic ways in history and in nature. For a period less sure of itself, this idea of the deep concealment of the action of Yahweh could become bitter. Later wisdom taught that the action of Yahweh in history grew weak, and how it was that action of Yahweh became prominent. Only with Ecclesiastes did this skepticism emerge broadly based, with radicalism and with weight. One way to view the book is as a skeptical and marginal note on the tradition of teachers of wisdom. It rests upon the traditional themes of the literature of wisdom, though freely glossing them. The magnificent poem (1:4ff) on the hopeless cycle of all things opens up the view of the world in which the thought and questioning of the book move. In this world devoid of all action of Yahweh in history, the book seeks God. The writer knows that God created the world and acts upon it. However, the calamity of humanity is that people cannot contact this divine action, because God deeply conceals this activity. God has appointed toil for humanity. The writer knows only the empirical way of coming into contact with God. Yet, the world remains silent in the face of this quest for salvation. The writer is suspended over the abyss of despair. The author counsels acceptance and enjoyment of the possible in every case contain a pointer to God. They are the only maxims that bring human action with an almost astonishing directness into connection with a positive will of God. When the text mentions the portion allotted to humanity, it suggests that God has allotted it and humanity is to find contentment in it. Ecclesiastes is a polemical book. What wise person ever claimed to discern all the work of Yahweh under the sun? It could personify the friends of Job. The author pitches a tent on the edges of Judaism with a tragic view of life. Humanity is not able to keep in step with the dark, divine power to which it is handed over. No matter what trouble humanity takes, humanity can never do anything but fail in the attempt to reach accord with the action of this God. Nothing remained for Ecclesiastes, but to submit in deep resignation to this tragic existence. 

Theologian Karl Barth made some comments on Ecclesiastes that provides both a comparison and a contrast with Proust. He is close to the explorations of Proust in the sense that it took a revelation or disclosure at the end to reveal how the hero could redeem time. This would be like what he calls the subjective revelation one receives from the Holy Spirit. The contrast, however, is that the subjectivity of this revelation has its counterpart in the objectivity of the revelation of God in Jesus Christ. In other words, time lost or wasted is outside this revelation. Time regained or redeemed has its definition in Jesus, through whom the believer now lives his life. In some comments on Ecclesiastes, Barth discusses the myth of infinite or endless time. If religion has the purpose of providing a narrative in which human beings find meaning in their everyday activities and in the repeating cycles of their lives, Barth is going to say that Revelation has shattered endless time. Infinite time exists only for a time-consciousness that is unaware of or forgetful of revelation. A time-consciousness aware of revelation will quite certainly not be a consciousness void of time, but full of time and congruous with it. He sees this myth of infinite and endless time expressed in Ecclesiastes. This confession impinges upon the confines of Epicureanism is intended as the sharpest expression of a consciousness of time and life really lived by the presence of God. In the New Testament, we find the description of the same time-consciousness compressed on the one hand into the concept of endurance, on the other hand in the concept of being awake.[40]

The hero of this story, as the hero of the story of your life, needs the epiphany that discloses the meaning of the course one has traveled in life. Such an epiphany makes one awake to the meaning of the live one has lived and will continue to live. Our secularity will say that any epiphany will do. Christianity will say that the content of that epiphany needs to find its definition in Jesus. It ought not to surprise that Christianity will find the answer to time wasted in Jesus. In any case, we might agree in general that openness to an unveiling, disclosure, or revelation may well be the difference between time wasted and time regained. 

 

---

[1]  (C. Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity 1989), 43.

[2]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985) Volume 2, 130-31.

[3]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 131-32.

[4]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 132-34.

[5] The New Lifetime Reading Plan, 4^th edition, (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1997), 240-3. 

[6]  (Watt 1957)21.

[7]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 101.

[8]  (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)xxi.

[9]  (Watt 1957)280.

[10]  (Watt 1957)292.

[11]  (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)181.

[12]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 135-41.

[13] (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)), 424-5.

[14]  (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)83.

[15]  (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)183.

[16]  (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)81.

[17]  (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)85-6.

[18]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 141-47.

[19]  (C. Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity 1989)), 51.

[20]  (C. Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity 1989)106.

[21]  (C. Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity 1989)459.

[22]  (C. Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity 1989)464.

[23]  (C. Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity 1989)479.

[24]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 147-8.

[25]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)), Volume 2, 148-9. 

[26]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)), Volume 2, 149-51.

[27]  (Ricoeur, Oneself as Another 1992)172.

[28]  (Merleau-Ponty 1945, 1962)393.

[29]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 147.

[30] David Brooks, “The Moral Bucket List,” New York Times, April 11, 2015.

[31]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 134.

[32]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 3, 271-72.

[33]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 2, 151-52.

[34]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)), Volume 3, 131-32.

[35]  ( (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 3, 134-35.

[36]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 3, 136-37.

[37]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)Volume 3, 138

[38]  (Ricoeur, Time and Narrative 1984, 1985)), Volume 3, 272.

[39]  (C. Taylor, A Secular Age 2007)712-20.

[40] (Barth 2004, 1932-67)I.2 [14.1] 69.