As Chris Wallace said, Obama’s performance stopped the bleeding in his
campaign, so Democrats will be happy. I think Republicans will be
happy, too. Romney came off as knowledgeable and didn’t back down.
Fox News contributor Brit Hume gave his analysis on the candidates
during the town hall-style presidential debate. He assessed that
President Obama was more aggressive and assertive this time around,
whereas Mitt Romney was “basically the same” as he was during the first
debate.
Hume said that since the president raised his game in
comparison to his first debate performance, he will come out as the
winner. He continued, “I will say this though, it was clear time and
time again the difficultly the president has in being the incumbent.”
This
was apparent when a voter in the audience told President Obama that
he’s not as optimistic as he was four years ago. “There’s really no
rebuttal to that. There’s no way a good debate performance can get you
around that,” Hume said.
Charles Krauthammer reacted to the second presidential debate on
tonight’s post-debate analysis, saying of the contentious debate, “this
was a boxing match … at one point, I thought they were going to use
their mics as weapons,” turning it into a Taiwanese parliament.
“Obama
clearly had a good night,” Krauthammer said, asserting that on points,
President Obama won the debate. “When Romney went large he did well,
when Romney went small [...] Obama got the better of him.”
One area that Krauthammer said
offered Romney a “huge opening that he missed” was on the topic of
Libya. Krauthammer said the president “was completely at sea” on
questions on the Benghazi attack. “He didn’t even try to answer it.”
According to Dick Morris, Romney looked more presidential than Obama did and showed himself to be an
articulate, capable, attractive, compassionate leader with sound ideas. When a president gets into a bar room brawl, he loses his dignity and
his aura, key assets for an incumbent. Romney was polite but firm. Obama
seemed quarrelsome, frustrated, nasty, and cranky.
1. Romney made very clear the case against Obama's economic record and Obama's rebuttal about 5 million jobs was pathetic.
2. Romney injected the China issue, big time, and tapped into a strong public sentiment on the issue.
3. Romney made the effective case that Obama is anti-oil, coal, and gas and that this has doubled gas prices.
4. Romney was very effective in
differentiating himself from Bush-43 and in establishing that, unlike
the GOP of the past, he was for small businesses not big businesses
5. Romney rebutted the attacks on him over Chinese investments.
6. Romney explained his tax plan well and to everyone's satisfaction.
7. Obama erred in trying to make us believe that he always felt Libya was a terror attack. We all heard him blame the movie.
Obama scored points over the 47% statement by Romney,
immigration, and by his response to the accusation that he went to
Vegas after the murder of the Ambassador.
In another composition, Morris offered the following for believing that Romney is on his way to victory.
Romney:
1) Explained his tax plan very well. His suggestion that he would allow up to a flat $25,000 in deductions was excellent.
2) Recited the statistics of
economic decline so well and so frequently that they will be repeated
again and again by voters as they contemplate their decision.
3) Clearly pinned the blame for high gas prices on Obama by enumerating the president's anti-oil, anti-coal policies.
4) Put the China issue in play big
time by explaining Chinese currency manipulation. In the next debate,
Romney should drill down and explain how much Chinese chicanery and
hacking costs us jobs and how passive Obama has been in the face of
their conduct.
5) Demonstrated his compassion and
heart in his personal stories of his ministry. He should continue just
this kind of argumentation.
Here is some fact checking.
President Barack Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney faced off last night in
the second of three presidential debates, with just three weeks
remaining before Election Day. The town hall forum was held at Hofstra University in New York, and was moderated by CNN’s Candy Crowley.
So where did the candidates get it right and where did they stray from the facts?
Check out this fact check courtesy of the Fox News Brainroom:
1) Romney said Detroit should go bankrupt
Romney:
“And one thing that the president said, which I want to make sure that
we understand, he said that I said we should take Detroit bankrupt. And
that’s right. My plan was to have the company go through bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macy’s and Condell (ph) Airlines and come out stronger.”
TRUE. Romney called for a managed bankruptcy in a New York Times Op-Ed.
This
statement is drawn from a headline – “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt” – on an
opinion article written by Romney for The New York Times. But he did not
say that in the article. (He repeated the line, however, on
television.)
Although “bankrupt” often conjures up images of liquidation, Romney
called for a “managed bankruptcy.” This is a process in which the
company uses the bankruptcy code to discharge its debts, but emerges
from the process a leaner, less leveraged company.
Romney: And I
think it’s important to know that that was a process that was necessary
to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring
more people. That was precisely what I recommended and ultimately what
happened.
Crowley: “Let me give the president a chance.”
Obama:
“Candy, what Governor Romney said just isn’t true. He wanted to take
them into bankruptcy without providing them any way to stay open. And we
would have lost a million jobs. And that — don’t take my word for it,
take the executives at GM and Chrysler, some of whom are Republicans,
may even support Governor Romney. But they’ll tell you his prescription
wasn’t going to work.”
Obama’s statement is FALSE.
[Source: "Fact Check: Letting Detroit go bankrupt," The Washington Post: 17 Oct 2012]
2) Women earn less than men
Question:
“In what new ways do you intend to rectify the inequalities in the
workplace, specifically regarding females making only 72 percent of what
their male counterparts earn?”
The question posed was slightly INACCURATE.
The
Census Bureau, which tracks annual wages, found women who worked
full-time, year-round in 2010 made 77 cents for every dollar men earned
across the country. This comparison includes all male and female workers
regardless of occupation.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics uses
different measures to analyze the pay gap, including weekly wages. In
2010, women working full-time had median weekly earnings of $669, versus
$824 for males, according to a BLS report released in 2011. So women
earned 81 cents of every dollar earned by men, which has been typical
since 2004.
[Source: Politifact]
3) Romney’s 60 Minutes interview
Obama:
“Now, Governor Romney has a different philosophy. He was on 60 Minutes
just two weeks ago and he was asked: Is it fair for somebody like you,
making $20 million a year, to pay a lower tax rate than a nurse or a bus
driver, somebody making $50,000 year? And he said, ‘Yes, I think that’s
fair.’ Not only that, he said, ‘I think that’s what grows the
economy.’”
FACT CHECK – Obama took Romney’s words
slightly out of context and also misled the audience when he added,
“And he said,’Yes, I think that’s fair.’ Not only that, he said, ‘I
think that’s what grows the economy.’”
The president’s comments
suggested that Romney thinks the economy will grow by virtue of bus
drivers paying less than millionaires. But the Republican candidate was
really saying that limiting taxes on investment income will encourage
people to invest more of their money into the economy.
Note that
none of this has anything to do with individual income tax, for which
both Romney and Obama have both proposed progressive systems requiring
higher earners to pay more than lower earners.
Here’s a transcript of the relevant part of that conversation between Romney and 60 Minutes reporter Scott Pelley:
Pelley:
“You made on your investments, personally, about twenty million dollars
last year and you paid fourteen percent in federal taxes. That`s the
capital gains rate. Is that fair to the guy who makes fifty thousand
dollars and paid a higher rate than you did?
Romney: It is a low
rate. And one of the reasons why the capital gains tax rate is lower is
because capital has already been taxed once at the corporate level, as
high as thirty-five percent.
Pelley: So you think it is fair?
Romney:
Yeah, I think it’s the right way to encourage economic growth, to get
people to invest, to start businesses, to put people to work.”
[Source:The Washington Post: 16 Oct 2012]
4) Obama’s China connection
Obama
deflected questions about his own investments in China with a joke. But
independent reports have shown Obama holds shares in mutual funds that
invest in Apple, Wal-Mart and other U.S. firms with operations in China.
[source: Washington Post -- Fact Check, Debate: Fact Check: China investments, Oct 16, 2012]
The
Romney campaign claims that President Obama has money invested in China
too, albeit indirectly. The president’s financial disclosure shows he
has retirement money in Vanguard mutual funds and the Illinois pension
plan. Those funds list investments in some 500 companies, including
Apple, Wal Mart, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and General Electric.
Those
firms have employees and in some cases, manufacturing facilities in
China, which relates to another campaign hot-button issue: outsourcing.
However, the companies themselves are based in the U.S. The investments
involve domestic, not international, stock purchases.
[source: Politifact - Obama says Romney talks tough on China but puts his money there, Sept 13, 2012]
_____________________
What Romney said last night:
Romney:
Yeah. Just going to make a point. Any investments I have over the last
eight years have been managed by a blind trust. And I understand they do
include investments outside the United States, including in – in
Chinese companies. Mr. President, have you looked at your pension?
Obama: (Inaudible) – Candy -
Romney: Have you looked at your pension?
Obama: I’ve got to say – (inaudible) -
Romney: Mr. President, have you looked at your pension?
Obama: You know, I don’t look at my pension. It’s not as big as yours, so it – it doesn’t take as long. The -
Romney: Well, let me – let me give you – (laughter) – let me – let me give you some advice.
Obama: I don’t check it that often. (Chuckles.)
Romney: Let me give you some advice. Look at your pension.
Obama: (Chuckles.) OK.
Romney: You also have investments in Chinese companies.
Obama: Yeah.
Romney: You also have investments outside the United States.
Obama: Yeah.
Romney: You also have investments through a Caymans trust, all right?
5) Speaking time
According
to a tally by CNN, the president received over three minutes of
additional speaking time compared to Gov. Romney. Obama spoke for a
total of 44:04 while Romney spoke for 40:50.
No comments:
Post a Comment